Nobody kept their kids home for 18 or 20 years just discussing life with them, hanging out, playing games.This blew my mind. My first thought was, geesh, what else *would* we be doing with them? I had never stopped to consider that unschooling is a product of/reaction to the culture that we all live in, that the time will come when unschooling is irrelevant because the whole concept of education is different. Who knows what people will be doing with their kids in 100 or 200 or 1,000 years? It was very helpful for me to see that unschooling was the *method* that some folks are currently using to allow natural ways of learning emerge in this present cultural moment that happens to privilege compulsory education. It was also fun to think about ways some people have probably always tried to work around or away from whatever system or custom or laws happen to be in place at the time in order to learn what they want in the ways that are best for them.We probably wouldn't be either, if it weren't that we're biding time until the clock runs out on compulsory education.
But! Also, I thought, wow, what a perfect expression of humanity in this day and age unschooling is! We can get our hands on so much information, we can get to so many places, we can access so many people because of this very cool moment in history of the Internet, fairly easy transportation, and enough leisure time (versus time spent focused on surviving) to explore ideas and try skills and make friends and connections.
People have a lot of resources these days, and they are mostly very accessible; of course it makes sense that some of them would seek to use what's available to them when they want it, not just what the schools offer between 8 and 3. It possibly has never been easier to learn about as many different things from so many different sources as it is right now.
I'm with you that what seems to those of us coming from a different paradigm as "miraculous" may well be the most logical outcome of trying to make the most of living in the here and now.
Teresa
mama to Woody (6 1/2) and Fox (3 1/2)
"Compulsory education" is an archaic term I used out of habit. Due to lawsuits in late 20th century America, many states quietly changed the term to "compulsory attendance."The lawsuits came because some kids in the U.S. were high school graduates, but they couldn't read or write or do math (one or two or both) and the parents got angry at the schools for having kept them in there without providing that "compulsory education." So the terminology toggled over to make the law say that it was compulsory that the children attend (children and teens, because in that same time the drop-out age went from 15 incrementally up to 17 and 18 in many places).
Ta-daa!!! No more obligation for the state to provide education, just for the parents to press the students to attend.
Sorry for the political historical commentary, but "compulsory education" jumped out at me as a sort of error—an anachronism. 🙂
(original, if it's still there)