Dan Vilter

Don't you know that some of us have full time jobs! And moonlight
occasionally.

Here I sit with 15 minutes to look over AlwaysLearning and find there
are 260 new post since the 30 minutes I had yesterday to look it over.
And most seem to be about TV, a subject I care passionately about. But
with this posting volume I CAN'T EVEN BE A RESPONSIBLE LURKER! <G>
I'm sure Pam and Pam and Sandra have covered beautifully, my pro TV
without limits opinion. I'll have to wait till I have time to look it
over to find out.


Himn... lots of posts from Sandra. She must have spoke her view far too
clearly and succinctly for the quasi unschoolers or newbies to stomach.
I'm sure when I read these posts at the end of the week (when the show
I'm currently working on opens) I will be thanking you.

I can't wait to find out.

I think I'll ask my LTW for a recap...

-Dan Vilter

Pam Hartley

----------
From: Dan Vilter <dvilter@...>
To: Always Learning <[email protected]>
Subject: [AlwaysLearning] Ack! 260 posts in 23 hours!
Date: Tue, Jan 29, 2002, 7:10 AM


But
with this posting volume I CAN'T EVEN BE A RESPONSIBLE LURKER!
----------


Yesterday I was playing Pokemon with my four year old and reading and
writing posts. <g> Then I would catalog books (71 new entries yesterday) and
read and write posts. Then I was calling all my girl scout parents (thank
goodness for DSL, always on! <g>) to get their cookie counts for the
pre-order, and reading and writing posts. Then I was talking to Brit about
why the light bulb in her battery-operated Mike (from Monsters Inc) necklace
wasn't necessarily green, it might be a filter in there somewhere, and
reading and writing posts. And then Wally took her off with a lamp and a
pile of filters-on-the-go (clothes, mostly <g>) to make light change color,
and I continued reading and writing posts.

Some days, we're out of the house all day. Just luck. :)

Don't worry, this time in two weeks we'll probably be getting people posting
notes saying, "Is this thing working? I haven't got a post all day!" The
nature of mailing lists.

Pam



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]