After some disturbing side e-mails, I posted this to the Always Learning list on May 21, 2009: **
good advice and bad advice
Without the least intention of apologizing for using "good" and "bad," I want to remind people of the purpose of this list. Those who are sure of it already, remind yourself. Those who aren't sure, read here: /alwayslearning There are some new list members, which is a constant, and which is good. There are some new list members posting here without regard to the fact that it's an unschooling discussion list. That is not good. Long posts about school are not good for the list. Repetitive posts explaining posts that were repetitive in the first place are not good for the list. ALL POSTS should be questions or stories about unschooling or responses based on unschooling principles. When I ask for people to give enough information that answers are useful, that's not the same as asking for all the details in the world. Leaving something out like that the child is still in school, or 12 and adopted, or the parents are in the process of separating--- BIG things like that---that can be a waste of the time of the people who are offering advice. These things are quoted from a post that was returned: -=-It isn't fair for one person to be "Cinderella," and the others to be the stepsisters" who expect the "maid" to take care of their every whim.-=-The first part isn't helpful, and the second part isn't true. These topics have been discussed for many years here, and there are "good parts" collected on Joyce's site and mine both. Anyone who's feeling like Cinderella could use reading this /chores/gift and following the links and this: http://joyfullyrejoycing.com/influencing%20kid%20behavior/ chores/kidstohelpwithchores.html Sandra Re: [AlwaysLearning] good advice and bad advice What kind of democratic list can one have, if one censors everything. Just because it's not what you personally believe. I have noticed, that you make a lot of referals to links that YOU created, like you're the only opinion that matters, and you want people to believe that you're the "expert" on the subject. What I said about Cinderella, is true, a mom on the other list felt the same way too. And, He WILL be self sufficient. How can you predict that he won't be. How can anyone speak freely on this list if you're going to personally censor everything you don't agree with. I'm surprised you didn't bash the lady with the 4 year old and say something like, the other people did, you can't let him make choices, who cares about pajamas, let him sleep wherever, don't give him milk in bed, it'll rot his teeth, etc and so on None of these replies would have been helpful to her. So I'm going where the open minded, and non judgemental people are. A lady said she was lurking on a list such as yours, and left because of the slamming of people. No one gets slammed on your list, except from you. You simply don't let anyone interact with the people on the list, unless you personally agree with what they're saying or asking. So you can refer them to your personal web links. You need to read about democracy.
From: [email protected] Subject: Re: [AlwaysLearning] good advice and bad advice Date: May 21, 2009 4:39:01 PM MDT To: [email protected] I let the response through because it was kind of awful. I think I'll let the original post onto the list, too, in case anyone here is wondering why a post would be returned. -=-What kind of democratic list can one have, if one censors everything. Just because it's not what you personally believe. -=- I personally believe that advice that's not at ALL from an unschooling point of view, from someone who's been on the list for less than a week, is not in keeping with the purpose of the list. And where did it say this was "a democratic list"? It's my list. -=-I have noticed, that you make a lot of referals to links that YOU created, like you're the only opinion that matters, and you want people to believe that you're the "expert" on the subject.-=- Anyone who's followed those links will know that there are very few written just by me, and many written completely by people other than me. The reason I keep the site, and Joyce keeps her unschooling site, is that the same questions are asked over and over and OVER and over over the years. Even though Joyce and I also do several hours of work each week keeping lists available for people to continue to ponder and analyze and discuss these same, same questions, we also collect the best parts so people can find them without joining a list (and people do find them) and so that people on the lists can read LOTS of good advice and ideas about their current question, if it has come up before. -=-What I said about Cinderella, is true, a mom on the other list felt the same way too.-=- OH!~ A mom felt that way!? MILLIONS OF MOMS feel that way, and it's not making them happy. It will not create the relationship with their child that they need for unschooling to thrive. -=-No one gets slammed on your list, except from you. You simply don't let anyone interact with the people on the list, unless you personally agree with what they're saying or asking. So you can refer them to your personal web links.-=- "Simply"? I "simply" don't let anyone interact!??? This list was created November 24, 2001. There are 45,421 messages in the archives (there will be more by the time this one is posted). How is that evidence that I don't let people communicate!? The post I returned had some very harsh recommendations. I'll put it on the list with a disclaimer, and without the name of the original poster because if she's not ashamed now, she might be ashamed of it someday. I had intended to spare her. Sandra
|
Below is my note returning the post quoted below. I'm letting it through to the list. This has taken half an hour of my day, corresponding with someone who hadn't been on the list for a week. What I didn't include below was the 1285 words of appended posts (any macintosh will count words with one click, so don't think I counted them myself I didn't even mention how dangerous, abusive and possibly illegal the recommendation to lock a child in his room with the light off is. From here down is the cover, and then the post I had returned. Sandra ------------------------------------------------------------ There are several reasons this is returned. You've appended two long posts. Please don't do that. If you must quote from another post, post only enough to help readers remember the part to which you're responding. From: Date: May 21, 2009 3:21:01 PM MDT To: "Sandra Dodd" Subject: Re: Post returned I give up. I'm going to the much friendlier other list. My posts are informative, and don't go on about pointless topics like school bells. It's too bad the lady with the 4 year old won't get to hear my ideas. They might help her, but I guess she'll never know. I KNEW you weren't going to post this. Every other post on her has had the previous post/posts attached to it. I've done nothing any diffferent than anyone else. I will let people know, this is the list NOT to go to for any reason.
Subject: Re: Post returned From: [email protected] Date: May 21, 2009 4:24:29 PM MDT -=-I give up. I'm going to the much friendlier other list. My posts are informative, and don't go on about pointless topics like school bells.=- School recovery is not at all pointless to unschoolers. Had you followed the post that went to, it had to do with a story of my kids first hearing school bells when they were 12 and 14. There are friendlier lists, but there aren't more useful lists, if you want to learn about unschooling.
There are many lists with advice like this: Sandra |