Bill and Diane

> Hi Ned:

Your points are solid, clear minded, and ring true: others perception of
them sucks,
sounds egotistical, and guides people to think you are near sighted. If
you think this to be a punch it is ment to be constructive. Leaving out
personal pronouns (I, Me, My) will get rid of the perceived egotistical
nature
of your comments. The other two are more difficult and would best be
delivered
in metaphore. The problem that exists with all the American Zombies not
realizing that a police state is decending upon them is fear of change.
The very thing that school has so well implanted. The other thing is
that nobody
here has experienced a police state. So the look and feel is not known.
When Capt.
Cook sailed into Hawaiian Harbors none of the natives ever seen him
until the smaller
boats were launched.

>
People are made of a small conscious mind with very limited uses and largely
emotionless, the subconscious is as opposed to the conscious a behemoth
emotional
monster with capabilities unknown and vast. Subconscious processes are
where somebody with a message should speak. This is why people like
Mohammad,
..., went through such hell prior to their messages being joined, they had
to figure out why they were ridiculed. Subconscious is all emotion,
memory,
and process, conscious is a gatekeeper to keep crap out of the subconscious
but it is very easily fouled and to keep pee brain (conscious) from
overload.
Hypnosis is the bypass of a part of the brain referred to as the hypocampus
or if you will a doorway that bypasses the gatekeeper. The hypocampus
differentiates
between what is real and what is imagined. Metaphore bypasses too but the
metaphore must adhere to a certain structure. This structure is known as
"the rules of mind" This would be fun to study if your goal is to influence
the thoughts in others. Also in NLP (Neural Linguistic Programming) how
to anchor would be a great benefit as it relates to how to attract and repel
at choice or associate internal thoughts with attractive and repulsive
emotions.
A ripe source for these but probably too advanced is Frogs to Princes by
Richard Bandler. If you think this is horse shit then perhaps you should
check out the resolution of a murder case where Richard Bandler acted as
his own attorney. It is a great deal of fun to see somebody tell the jury
that they committed the murder and see the verdict as not guilty. Bandler
is also not a very nice person in that he had often called the judge and
jury "fuck ups" durring the trial and was never heard by either, but the
stenographer captured it. Also your use of what are called predicates is
nonexistant. If you will, let a sentence be constructed that describes
a car it will appeal to different people if it appeals to different
senses.
That is just as people tend to be different handed they also tend to use
on one sense more than another.



To appeal to visual people it would suffice to say: The yellow Volks
Wagon made a shinning entrance.

To appeal to a auditory person: The yellow Volks Wagon rang my bell.

To appeal to a kinesthetic you would say: The yellow Volks Wagon had
hands on appeal.

To appeal to all groups noted: The yellow VW made a shinning entrance
that rang my bell with its hands on appeal.


An easier reference would be monsters and magical sticks.



Bill