Valerie

I just saw on another list that there is an egroup dedicated to "those who
like to view naked little girls aged 4-10".
www.egroups.com/group/nudismkids
I would like to write to the Powers That Be of eGroups and get this trash
dumped. Who do I contact?

--Valerie

Valerie

just reviewed the TOS for egroups, and if they follow thier own rules, they
should remove the group.
Please email [email protected]?subject=TOS Violation
Please tell them to refer to Item 4 b - Member Conduct, as well as Item
5 - Special Admonitions for International Use. Also, make sure you tell
them which group you're referring to.
http://www.egroups.com/group/nudismkids
eGroups does have adult content groups, but they do have provisions for
groups that "harm minors in any way."

As of now, a "lolita" site has been removed but the group still exists. The
FBI has been contacted.>
>
> I just saw on another list that there is an egroup dedicated to "those
> who
> like to view naked little girls aged 4-10".
* www.egroups.com/group/nudismkids> I
*
* >
> >

Kim

Blank
I wrote into egroups custumer service and demanded that they take out that list.  I should have gone further and demanded they file a complaint with the proper authorities.  At the bottom of every list site homepage, there is a link to the customer service. 
Kim
 
 
 

0700
   From: "Nanci and Thomas Kuykendall" <tn-k4of5@...>
Subject: RE: child porn on egroups

>I just saw on another list that there is an
egroup dedicated to "those who
>like to view naked little girls aged
4-10".
>
href="http://www.egroups.com/group/nudismkids">www.egroups.com/group/nudismkids
>I
would like to write to the Powers That Be of eGroups and get this trash
>dumped. Who do I contact?
>
>--Valerie

<<I don't know who you contact or even if you can do anything about it.  Apparently that is accurate though.  I went there and checked it out.  There are not messages in their archives, and the group was formed Aug. 29 of this year.  Also they put the description (which is translated word for word above in Valerie's post,) in french.  My french was good enough to translate and verify that it does indeed say what Valerie reported.  I suppose they thought to hide their intent by putting it in french...who knows?>>

Nanci K.