meeting everyones needs
thebabywoman
I have been reading, thinking, watching my reactions towards my children, etc. for awhile now. I am deschooling basically, and I feel like I am coming along surely, but slowly on some issues more than others.
What I cannot wrap my head around is how to meet the needs of EVERYONE and still do things together. I am so frustrated. Yesterday I went to a funeral for an almost 2 yo little boy (he drowned), from a homeschooling family I have known for many years. I am very emotional and I realize I wanted today, to do something away from the house, something fun and different partly as a result of how I am feeling. I want to spend some fun time making memories with my children, as they are precious and life with them is so short.
I asked them where they'd like to go, and gave a few suggestions, they suggested a few. We narrowed it down to the Forks (market, with nature trails, shopping, buskers). When we got there, I drove around and around trying to find parking, then got turned around. My 15yo said, Why don't we just go to the park (one of the suggestions) instead. The parking is so limited, and it will take awhile to find a spot.
I looked at my watch, and said, yah, that might be a good idea. What do you guys think. Three agreed, two didn't. One said she was too tired to go to the park (9yo) 7yo said she didn't know what she wanted to do. The 5 yo agreed, but was disappointed, as she wanted to spend money at The Forks. I told her we could buy a treat on the way home from the park. she asked what slushies cost. I told her she had enough for a small slushie. Then she started whining/almost crying that she was so hungry. My o15 yo, who had suggested the park a minute ago, now said she wished she had brought a ball for her and her 17yo sister to use, because what were they to do while the other younger three played at the play structure. At some point I just fell apart and said I was taking everyone home, because there was no way to make everyone happy. ( I came home and bawled in my room. I did something stupid first...my 9yo asked to play outside, and I said no, if you are too tired to go to the park, then you're too tired to play outside. I realize now how I was mad and over reacting, and without realizing it, maybe even trying to punish her, because I believed she wasn't actually tired at all)
I have 6 daughters, 5 homeschooling, one at home, but she's working full time. How on earth, with a spread from 19 years old to 5 years old, can you do anything as a family with everyone happy? How can you have any family memories if you always wait till everyone wants to go do the same thing? Many times, we have done a family event, in which one or two weren't particularily thrilled with the choice, but they came along and were happy they did. Many funny and wonderful times have come out of us being together. Now that I'm reading on this list and unschooling sites, I feel like I shouldn't have forced them to come, that it wasn't right, but at the same time, how can anyone have any family time together otherwise?
I just can't figure that out. Help!
What I cannot wrap my head around is how to meet the needs of EVERYONE and still do things together. I am so frustrated. Yesterday I went to a funeral for an almost 2 yo little boy (he drowned), from a homeschooling family I have known for many years. I am very emotional and I realize I wanted today, to do something away from the house, something fun and different partly as a result of how I am feeling. I want to spend some fun time making memories with my children, as they are precious and life with them is so short.
I asked them where they'd like to go, and gave a few suggestions, they suggested a few. We narrowed it down to the Forks (market, with nature trails, shopping, buskers). When we got there, I drove around and around trying to find parking, then got turned around. My 15yo said, Why don't we just go to the park (one of the suggestions) instead. The parking is so limited, and it will take awhile to find a spot.
I looked at my watch, and said, yah, that might be a good idea. What do you guys think. Three agreed, two didn't. One said she was too tired to go to the park (9yo) 7yo said she didn't know what she wanted to do. The 5 yo agreed, but was disappointed, as she wanted to spend money at The Forks. I told her we could buy a treat on the way home from the park. she asked what slushies cost. I told her she had enough for a small slushie. Then she started whining/almost crying that she was so hungry. My o15 yo, who had suggested the park a minute ago, now said she wished she had brought a ball for her and her 17yo sister to use, because what were they to do while the other younger three played at the play structure. At some point I just fell apart and said I was taking everyone home, because there was no way to make everyone happy. ( I came home and bawled in my room. I did something stupid first...my 9yo asked to play outside, and I said no, if you are too tired to go to the park, then you're too tired to play outside. I realize now how I was mad and over reacting, and without realizing it, maybe even trying to punish her, because I believed she wasn't actually tired at all)
I have 6 daughters, 5 homeschooling, one at home, but she's working full time. How on earth, with a spread from 19 years old to 5 years old, can you do anything as a family with everyone happy? How can you have any family memories if you always wait till everyone wants to go do the same thing? Many times, we have done a family event, in which one or two weren't particularily thrilled with the choice, but they came along and were happy they did. Many funny and wonderful times have come out of us being together. Now that I'm reading on this list and unschooling sites, I feel like I shouldn't have forced them to come, that it wasn't right, but at the same time, how can anyone have any family time together otherwise?
I just can't figure that out. Help!
Sandra Dodd
-=- I am very emotional and ...-=-
Not every day, or every week, will involve the funeral of a child.
Don't judge what normal days should be like by unusual and stressful
days when you're still new to unschooling.
-=- At some point I just fell apart and said I was taking everyone
home, because there was no way to make everyone happy. ( I came home
and bawled in my room.-=-
Ah...
When there's stress and emotion and hunger and thirst, it's pretty
much a guarantee to make everyone UNhappy.
-=-How on earth, with a spread from 19 years old to 5 years old, can
you do anything as a family with everyone happy?-=-
You don't try to do things with everyone all at once. Go with
subgroups.
-=- How can you have any family memories if you always wait till
everyone wants to go do the same thing?-=-
"Family memories"?
Go for individual happy memories, and the peace of individuals. If
you try for "family peace," instead of individual peace, it will not
be peaceful for everyone very often.
-=-I have been reading, thinking, watching my reactions towards my
children, etc. for awhile now. I am deschooling basically, and I feel
like I am coming along surely, but slowly on some issues more than
others. -=-
I'm guessing you have years of schoolishness and rules to overcome.
It won't be the same as a family that added one more person at a time
to an already unschooling group.
Sandra
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Not every day, or every week, will involve the funeral of a child.
Don't judge what normal days should be like by unusual and stressful
days when you're still new to unschooling.
-=- At some point I just fell apart and said I was taking everyone
home, because there was no way to make everyone happy. ( I came home
and bawled in my room.-=-
Ah...
When there's stress and emotion and hunger and thirst, it's pretty
much a guarantee to make everyone UNhappy.
-=-How on earth, with a spread from 19 years old to 5 years old, can
you do anything as a family with everyone happy?-=-
You don't try to do things with everyone all at once. Go with
subgroups.
-=- How can you have any family memories if you always wait till
everyone wants to go do the same thing?-=-
"Family memories"?
Go for individual happy memories, and the peace of individuals. If
you try for "family peace," instead of individual peace, it will not
be peaceful for everyone very often.
-=-I have been reading, thinking, watching my reactions towards my
children, etc. for awhile now. I am deschooling basically, and I feel
like I am coming along surely, but slowly on some issues more than
others. -=-
I'm guessing you have years of schoolishness and rules to overcome.
It won't be the same as a family that added one more person at a time
to an already unschooling group.
Sandra
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
m_aduhene
Sandra wrote:
As unschooling families we have the benefit of most of us being together most of the time anyway so we don't have to create these kind of "false" family times. Just asking, because (and i only have 3 children), sometimes I get these strong feelings that we should all do something "as as a family", say a board game or trip out, sometimes it works and sometimes one or another won't be that bothered by joining in.....and then I feel annoyed and can't understand why they don't want to do "family things". But it's often because they are happily doing their own thing.
blessings
michelle
> "Family memories"?and i just wanted to ask, is this something "they" (government, media...etc.) have come up with to ease the guilt of working mums and dads?...ie. 'spend quality family time together at the weekend and it will make up for not being together all week'......or 'have 20 mins family time a day' and those kind of examples.
As unschooling families we have the benefit of most of us being together most of the time anyway so we don't have to create these kind of "false" family times. Just asking, because (and i only have 3 children), sometimes I get these strong feelings that we should all do something "as as a family", say a board game or trip out, sometimes it works and sometimes one or another won't be that bothered by joining in.....and then I feel annoyed and can't understand why they don't want to do "family things". But it's often because they are happily doing their own thing.
> Go for individual happy memories, and the peace of individuals. If you try for "family peace," instead of individual peace, it will not be peaceful for everyone very often.Thanks Sandra this eases the pressure as to how I view things for the future :-)
blessings
michelle
Chris S.
> "Family memories"?Zach was away at a friend's house last night and Zoe, Rick, and I had
> Go for individual happy memories, and the peace of individuals. If
> you try for "family peace," instead of individual peace, it will not
> be peaceful for everyone very often.
gone out for dinner -- to her favorite Mexican restaurant. We find
ourselves doing things, just the three of us, a lot more these days as
Zach's interests take him away from home and family more and more.
Zoe's emotions have been more powerful of late, she's almost 13 and
I think she's in the midst of lots of exciting and volatile hormonal
and developmental changes. She was feeling sad after dinner, thinking
about her best friend who moved away two years ago and whose birthday
is today. Zoe was missing her something terrible. Rick and I hung out
with her in the car, in the driveway, listening to her recount her
memories of good times with her friend. She was oscillating between
crying and laughing and she did not want to get out of the car --
maybe because she had our undivided attention.
After awhile, she'd stopped crying and we talked her into coming
inside the house. We were trying to think of something to do all
together -- I suggested watching a movie of her choosing (we use
Netflix Instant Watch a lot so there's thousands of movies to choose
from at our fingertips) but Zoe didn't feel like watching a movie. Zoe
suggested that we all play World of Warcraft together -- but we only
have two accounts -- so that wasn't something we could do all
together (besides, Rick doesn't enjoy WoW and he was reluctant.) It
was important to Zoe, that whatever we did, it included all three of
us - so she suggested we play Little Big Planet -- which is a video
game in which you create your own avatar, and you can build your own
platforms or play through other's platforms. I've watched Zoe play
LBP a lot but have never tried my hand at it so this was going to be a
new experience for me! We agreed to take turns, as we only had two
Playstation controllers.
We ended up having a blast - especially me. I laughed so hard at my
own ineptitude. Zoe really enjoyed talking me through how to create
my avatar and learning how to control it. Rick wasn't a lot more apt
at it than me so when it was the two of us running through a platform,
it was like an episode of Laurel and Hardy the way our avatars kept
getting knocked down and succumbing to the deadly obstacles. We
really all had such a wonderful time together and I'm sure our memory
of last night will go down as a very happy family memory -- all
because Rick and I were striving to make Zoe's life more peaceful and
happy.
After we finished playing LBP (when I was so tired my eyes couldn't
see the TV screen clearly anymore) we retired to our bedroom where we
watched Leave it to Beaver on my iPad (up close for my tired eyes.)
I'd asked for TV show suggestion on this list awhile back, and Leave
it to Beaver has become a part of Zoe's and my nightly routine --
right before I go to sleep we snuggle up in my bed and watch an
episode or two (except I usually end up sleeping through part of a
second episode.) What a lovely show that is! Zoe loves to analyze the
parenting and I'm watching Ward and June's behavior from a totally
different perspective than I did when I was a kid watching that show.
Some nights Rick joins us and some nights Zach watches with us.
Rarely, but on an occasion or two -- all four of us have crowded onto
our king-sized bed to watch Leave it to Beaver on my little iPad screen!
Happy memories of both the family and individual kind all coming out
of striving for individual peace.
Chris in IA
Joyce Fetteroll
On Jul 23, 2010, at 4:44 PM, thebabywoman wrote:
that. The kids shouldn't be responsible for your emotional well being.
make you miss your goal. Don't expect too much from a day with
everyone. Do make plans, but realize that the more people involved in
the plans, the more likely something won't run smoothly.
I was just discussing this with my daughter Kathryn. I got it in my
mind that I wanted to see Iron Man 2 but the only theater playing it
was an hour away in Seekonk. (Fortunately that part worked out!)
Seekonk has been overrun by chain stores so there isn't much there and
our expectations of doing anything else fun was low. But we had a
great meal at a Japanese restaurant we stumbled across, wandered past
a comic book shop while looking for the theater that we went back to
which also had used records, CDs, videos all neatly organized and it
turned out to be a great day.
Then when Kathryn's birthday came a week later, the expectations were
high and I realized my birthday had gone great because the
expectations of its greatness were so low. So we planned a few sure
fire things and stumbled across a neat latte place, a local history
museum and again it turned out great.
Enjoy the time that you get to spend with your kids (one at a time or
in any combination). Everyone is healthy and alive.
anticipating and keeping tabs on hunger and tiredness so you can
respond before emotions deteriorate.
Your daughter shouldn't be responsible for paying for a slushie if
she's hungry. If your rule is that treats are their responsibility,
that puts you in a bind when she's hungry and really wants a slushie.
That's the problem with rules. The rule got in the way of helping her
return to peacefulness so any bumps in the day didn't feel like craters.
together? The memories I have of the whole family doing something
together is about the activity we were doing. The best memories I have
of my family is doing things one on one with my sister or one parent.
Joyce
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> I am very emotionalWhich probably ramped up your expectations that the day would fix
that. The kids shouldn't be responsible for your emotional well being.
> and I realize I wanted today, to do something away from the house,It will help not to set your goals so high that imperfections will
> something fun and different partly as a result of how I am feeling.
> I want to spend some fun time making memories with my children, as
> they are precious and life with them is so short.
make you miss your goal. Don't expect too much from a day with
everyone. Do make plans, but realize that the more people involved in
the plans, the more likely something won't run smoothly.
I was just discussing this with my daughter Kathryn. I got it in my
mind that I wanted to see Iron Man 2 but the only theater playing it
was an hour away in Seekonk. (Fortunately that part worked out!)
Seekonk has been overrun by chain stores so there isn't much there and
our expectations of doing anything else fun was low. But we had a
great meal at a Japanese restaurant we stumbled across, wandered past
a comic book shop while looking for the theater that we went back to
which also had used records, CDs, videos all neatly organized and it
turned out to be a great day.
Then when Kathryn's birthday came a week later, the expectations were
high and I realized my birthday had gone great because the
expectations of its greatness were so low. So we planned a few sure
fire things and stumbled across a neat latte place, a local history
museum and again it turned out great.
Enjoy the time that you get to spend with your kids (one at a time or
in any combination). Everyone is healthy and alive.
> I told her we could buy a treat on the way home from the park. sheHungry and tired trump other wants. Part of successful unschooling is
> asked what slushies cost. I told her she had enough for a small
> slushie. Then she started whining/almost crying that she was so
> hungry.
anticipating and keeping tabs on hunger and tiredness so you can
respond before emotions deteriorate.
Your daughter shouldn't be responsible for paying for a slushie if
she's hungry. If your rule is that treats are their responsibility,
that puts you in a bind when she's hungry and really wants a slushie.
That's the problem with rules. The rule got in the way of helping her
return to peacefulness so any bumps in the day didn't feel like craters.
> I feel like I shouldn't have forced them to come, that it wasn'tDo you want them to have good memories or do you want them to be all
> right, but at the same time, how can anyone have any family time
> together otherwise?
together? The memories I have of the whole family doing something
together is about the activity we were doing. The best memories I have
of my family is doing things one on one with my sister or one parent.
Joyce
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Joyce Fetteroll
On Jul 25, 2010, at 9:44 AM, Joyce Fetteroll wrote:
sometimes a choice will mean moving closer to one and further from the
other. You need to decide which is the more important goal. Which you
will move toward when push comes to shove. No amount of determination
and desire will make them both doable all the time.
Joyce
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> Do you want them to have good memories or do you want them to be allTo clarify, you have two goals. Sometimes you can meet both. But
> together?
sometimes a choice will mean moving closer to one and further from the
other. You need to decide which is the more important goal. Which you
will move toward when push comes to shove. No amount of determination
and desire will make them both doable all the time.
Joyce
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
plaidpanties666
"thebabywoman" <shelldan@...> wrote:
Step away from the idea of "as a family". I have two kids, eight years apart, and its uncommon that we all find things we want to do together. The interests of a teenage male are waaaaay too different from those of a little girl most of the time. When they happen to coincide, its a gift, not something any of us have planned, and those are marvelous gifts! Wonderful moments of connection happen without anyone trying to make a memory - cherish those as they come up, between pairs and trios and don't fuss about "the whole family".
A little bit of that isn't a terrible thing - sometimes there aren't other good options for just one child who wants to stay behind - but more than a little can build resentment, even if the kids make the best of things and have a good time, they'll resent being "made to go" and come to resent the idea of family - which is probably the opposite of what you have in mind.
---Meredith (Mo 8, Ray 16)
>I want to spend some fun time making memories with my childrenThat can be the worst set-up for hurt feelings on the part of parents - and kids too! Don't worry about making memories. Focus on connecting with each child, on promoting more joy and comfort in your home, on helping people find options when those seem to be lacking. Doing that will give you plenty of fond memories. If you're having an icky moment, stop and look lovingly at a child, take a mental snapshot for later and turn the moment around at the same time.
>>How on earth, with a spread from 19 years old to 5 years old, can you do anything as a family with everyone happy?*************
Step away from the idea of "as a family". I have two kids, eight years apart, and its uncommon that we all find things we want to do together. The interests of a teenage male are waaaaay too different from those of a little girl most of the time. When they happen to coincide, its a gift, not something any of us have planned, and those are marvelous gifts! Wonderful moments of connection happen without anyone trying to make a memory - cherish those as they come up, between pairs and trios and don't fuss about "the whole family".
>>Many times, we have done a family event, in which one or two weren't particularily thrilled with the choice, but they came along and were happy they did.***************
A little bit of that isn't a terrible thing - sometimes there aren't other good options for just one child who wants to stay behind - but more than a little can build resentment, even if the kids make the best of things and have a good time, they'll resent being "made to go" and come to resent the idea of family - which is probably the opposite of what you have in mind.
>>how can anyone have any family time together otherwise?It seems like "family time" is important to you. Recognize that it may not be important to all of your kids, and that's Okay. Not everyone will value "family" or "family time" especially with a large group. Its more in the nature of some people to prefer the specialness of one-on-one connection, with parents or friends or one sibling at a time. That's not some kind of failure on your part! Its the way some people are, naturally.
---Meredith (Mo 8, Ray 16)
plaidpanties666
"m_aduhene" <m_aduhene@...> wrote:
The idea that "Family" is important is quite a bit older than that, as is the idea that families "should" do things all together to build loyalty to the group. Loyalty to the group is important if you end up at odds with another group, another family. In the part of rural TN where I live, there are still generation-old feuds (not so much the killing kind any more, thank goodness) and folks say "going to visit my people" to mean make a round of local cemetaries where ancestors and other kinfolk are buried. Families get together for occasions and events and you can still hear "he ain't right... but he's ours" as a way of accepting/forgiving pretty much anything from a relative.
There's a lot of... I'm tempted to say "cultural" importance to family, except that it extends beyond any particular culture. Humans have a need to connect and find/build community, and for some that translates into a love of family. The "family" aspect has been apothesized though, has become a kind of rule for how connection and community "should" happen. What's under the "rule" is the important thing - people need people - but how that happens best is an individual thing. We don't all need the same things from each other.
---Meredith
>is this something "they" (government, media...etc.) have come up with to ease the guilt of working mums and dads?...****************
The idea that "Family" is important is quite a bit older than that, as is the idea that families "should" do things all together to build loyalty to the group. Loyalty to the group is important if you end up at odds with another group, another family. In the part of rural TN where I live, there are still generation-old feuds (not so much the killing kind any more, thank goodness) and folks say "going to visit my people" to mean make a round of local cemetaries where ancestors and other kinfolk are buried. Families get together for occasions and events and you can still hear "he ain't right... but he's ours" as a way of accepting/forgiving pretty much anything from a relative.
There's a lot of... I'm tempted to say "cultural" importance to family, except that it extends beyond any particular culture. Humans have a need to connect and find/build community, and for some that translates into a love of family. The "family" aspect has been apothesized though, has become a kind of rule for how connection and community "should" happen. What's under the "rule" is the important thing - people need people - but how that happens best is an individual thing. We don't all need the same things from each other.
---Meredith
otherstar
>>>Step away from the idea of "as a family". I have two kids, eight years apart, and its uncommon that we all find things we want to do together. The interests of a teenage male are waaaaay too different from those of a little girl most of the time. When they happen to coincide, its a gift, not something any of us have planned, and those are marvelous gifts! Wonderful moments of connection happen without anyone trying to make a memory - cherish those as they come up, between pairs and trios and don't fuss about "the whole family".<<<I have changed my perspective of what it means to do stuff "as a family". Sometimes, we stay home as a family but we are each doing our own thing. Changing my idea of what family time means has been a big help in not getting caught up in having to do everything together. I have four kids under the age of ten so I don't really have the option of letting any of the kids stay home by themselves yet. The kids can stay home if one of my older nieces or nephews are around. Or, they occasionally have the option of going to grandma's house. My husband and I like to go shopping but that is too much to expect from the younger ones.
When we go out as a family, I try to build in a lot of flexibility. My 6 year old has a backpack that she takes everywhere with her because it has her Nintendo DS, her snacks and some other stuff that she likes to have around. I always try to make sure that we have extra clothes and toys in the car for my youngest two. We always have a blanket and beach/park toys in the back of our van in case we decide to make an impromptu trip to the beach or the park. I think we even have some kites stashed under the seat. Actually, I am not sure what all we have stashed in our van. We like to be prepared to do whatever our imagination decides on any given day. Our family outings usually consist of us getting in the car in the morning and setting out to have fun. We all have input into what we are going to do for the day. I find that it doesn't always work to have a plan beforehand because I never know when a place is going to be too packed to take the two little ones or if parking is going to be a problem. We also try to find fun ways to combine activities. If somebody wants to go in a store, then some of us can go in while everyone else sits in the car and listens to the radio, eats, or plays a game. We always stop and get take out on our days out so that everyone has a full tummy. Our girls have gotten to where they will beg for us to go out as a family because it is always fun and we try to find ways to do a little bit of everything.
>>>>A little bit of that isn't a terrible thing - sometimes there aren't other good options for just one child who wants to stay behind - but more than a little can build resentment, even if the kids make the best of things and have a good time, they'll resent being "made to go" and come to resent the idea of family - which is probably the opposite of what you have in mind.<<<That is precisely why we have a lot of family days at home. If we can't find ways to make everyone happy going out, then it is sometimes best to let it go and change gears. Being able to quickly change gears and come up with alternatives has been a great way to make family time possible. With large groups, I think it is almost impossible to find things that everyone likes to do. When you do find something that everyone likes, then go with it. All of my girls have recently discovered Pokemon so we have been making lots of trips to toy stores. That seems to be something that everyone enjoys. My teen niece and her friends are into Pokemon too so it is doubly awesome because they can come with us and help with the younger ones. Something else that we have recently discovered is MadLibs. All of my kids and my nieces and nephews LOVE them. We get them and leave them around the house. Every now and then one of the kids will run across them and suggest that we do them.
>>>It seems like "family time" is important to you. Recognize that it may not be important to all of your kids, and that's Okay. Not everyone will value "family" or "family time" especially with a large group. Its more in the nature of some people to prefer the specialness of one-on-one connection, with parents or friends or one sibling at a time. That's not some kind of failure on your part! Its the way some people are, naturally.<<<Growing up, I had a sister that hated going places. Everybody had a lot more fun when she was allowed to stay home. Our best memories as a whole family are those that were spent at home. Most of my family memories of us going out as a family were negative because it seemed like there was always one person that had a problem with what was going on. Even now, the best memories are those that are created as a result of being home with everybody doing their own thing and just hanging out.
Connie
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Sandra Dodd
-=->is this something "they" (government, media...etc.) have come up
with to ease the guilt of working mums and dads?...
****************
-=-The idea that "Family" is important is quite a bit older than that,
-=-
Sure, but the standing advice that sit-down-together dinner and
"family time" are crucial are recent repairs made to cultures taken
apart by factory work and school, I think.
If the only time families CAN be in the same place at the same time
all of them awake at the same time is dinner, then that becomes
"crucial." If the only time a parent can be with children is on the
one day off from work, and if there's only rarely a time when both
parents and all the kids are home and awake at the same time, then
that becomes paramount.
But in an unschooling situation with flexible schedules and relaxed
relationships, all the time is about the family, and eating together
is about sustenance, comfort, learning, and sharing, not about the
formality of eating by the clock and by the rules.
I was just reading this morning about the different view of "family"
in India than "western" countries they deal with, and especially now
that more Indians are living and working abroad, their families might
be in four or five different countries, but they still have social and
maybe financial obligations to that large, extended family. The term
"the nuclear family" isn't so old (20th century, which it would kind
of need to be...)
Found this. It's interesting:
Merriam-Webster dates the term back to 1947, whilst theOxford English
Dictionary has a reference to the term from1924; thus it is relatively
new, although nuclear family structures themselves date back thousands
of years.[5][6]The term "nuclear" is used in its general meaning
referring to a central entity or "nucleus" around which others collect.
In its most common usage, the term "nuclear family" refers to a
household consisting of a father, a mother and theirchildren all in
one household dwelling (siblings).[7] George Murdock also describes
the term in this way:
The family is a social group characterized by common residence,
economic cooperation and reproduction. It contains adults of both
sexes, at least two of whom maintain a socially approved sexual
relationship, and one or more children, own or adopted, of the
sexually cohabiting adults.
Some commentators also use the term to describe single-parent
households and families in which the parents are a cohabiting,
unmarried couple, though these individuals are overwhelmingly liberal.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_family
That's not the whole or end of any answer, it's just some more
material for consideration when people think about "family time" and
what or whether and when and why.
Sandra
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
with to ease the guilt of working mums and dads?...
****************
-=-The idea that "Family" is important is quite a bit older than that,
-=-
Sure, but the standing advice that sit-down-together dinner and
"family time" are crucial are recent repairs made to cultures taken
apart by factory work and school, I think.
If the only time families CAN be in the same place at the same time
all of them awake at the same time is dinner, then that becomes
"crucial." If the only time a parent can be with children is on the
one day off from work, and if there's only rarely a time when both
parents and all the kids are home and awake at the same time, then
that becomes paramount.
But in an unschooling situation with flexible schedules and relaxed
relationships, all the time is about the family, and eating together
is about sustenance, comfort, learning, and sharing, not about the
formality of eating by the clock and by the rules.
I was just reading this morning about the different view of "family"
in India than "western" countries they deal with, and especially now
that more Indians are living and working abroad, their families might
be in four or five different countries, but they still have social and
maybe financial obligations to that large, extended family. The term
"the nuclear family" isn't so old (20th century, which it would kind
of need to be...)
Found this. It's interesting:
Merriam-Webster dates the term back to 1947, whilst theOxford English
Dictionary has a reference to the term from1924; thus it is relatively
new, although nuclear family structures themselves date back thousands
of years.[5][6]The term "nuclear" is used in its general meaning
referring to a central entity or "nucleus" around which others collect.
In its most common usage, the term "nuclear family" refers to a
household consisting of a father, a mother and theirchildren all in
one household dwelling (siblings).[7] George Murdock also describes
the term in this way:
The family is a social group characterized by common residence,
economic cooperation and reproduction. It contains adults of both
sexes, at least two of whom maintain a socially approved sexual
relationship, and one or more children, own or adopted, of the
sexually cohabiting adults.
Some commentators also use the term to describe single-parent
households and families in which the parents are a cohabiting,
unmarried couple, though these individuals are overwhelmingly liberal.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_family
That's not the whole or end of any answer, it's just some more
material for consideration when people think about "family time" and
what or whether and when and why.
Sandra
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]