Re: [AlwaysLearning] AOL users - help

[email protected]

1 Feb 2002, at 7:00am

I never realized this when i had aol but as soon as I switched I found that
some other email programs don't recognize aol's links.
Here is what other users see.
<<HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?judgment">judgment</A>
<A HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?on">on</A> : <A
HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?try">TRY</A> 3: <A
HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?to">to</A> <A
HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?determine">determine</A>
<A >>

Is there another way to create links in an email coming from aol? maybe by
copying and pasting? I would love to follow the links but they arent
clickable and many times I find it hard to determine the actual URL from the
aol links. Or is there something I can change in my email program to be able
to read these or click on them?
Elissa, who will soon be singing
Yippee - Kai - Yay!
-----Original Message-----
From: kbcdlovejo@... <kbcdlovejo@...>
To: [email protected] <[email protected]>
Date: Friday, February 01, 2002 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: [AlwaysLearning] experience, age, and judging

>>>>>should never *judge* someone else. being judgemental (arrogant,
>closed-minded, etc), using judgemental terms (right, wrong, etc), is a

*huge*

>barrier to communication, no matter how you slice it.<<<<
>
>>>>>> yet sometimes we have to make judgments
>> in situations. <<<<
>
>two quotes from different posters.
>
>
>. <A HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?judge">judge</A>

\'j*j\ vb [<A HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?me">ME</A>
juggen, fr. <A HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?of">OF</A>
jugier, fr. L judicare, fr.

>judic-,]judex <A

>JUST</A>, <A

>judgment</A> <A

>deliberation</A> 4: <A

><A

>judg.er n2. <A

HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?judge">judge</A> n [<A
HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?me">ME</A> juge, fr. MF,
fr. L judex] : <A
HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?one">one</A> <A
HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?who">who</A> judges : <A
HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?as">as</A> : a

><A HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?public">public</A> <A

HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?official">official</A>
authorized <A HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?to">to</A>
<A HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?decide">decide</A>
questions <A
HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?brought">brought</A> <A
HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?before">before</A> a <A
HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?court">court</A> <A
HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?often">often</A> <A
HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?cap">

>cap</A> : a <A

HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?tribal">tribal</A> <A
HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?hero">hero</A> exercising
<A
HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?authority">authority</A>
<A HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?over">over</A> <A
HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?the">the</A> Hebrews <A
HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?after">after</A> <A
HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?the">the</A> <A
HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?death">death</A> <A
HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?of">of</A>

> <A HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?joshua">Joshua</A> :

><A HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?who">who</A> gives <A

HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?an">an</A> <A
HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?authoritative">authoritat
ive</A> <A
HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?opinion">opinion</A> :
<A HREF="http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~hallgren/wget.cgi?critic">CRITIC</A>

>
>
>Many people seem to equate "judgement" as something negative. It's NOT.

We're

>ALL judgemental---every day. We've all here "judged" the school sysem to

>lacking---and harmful, so we won't send our children there. We've all
>"judged" unschooling to be an exceptional way to rear our children.
>
>As a "judge" my job is to look at things objectively and form an educated
>opinion based on facts and hands-on experience. It's a GOOD thing!
>
>We all gain knowledge with age (well, MOST of us ;-) . Pam's daughter knows
>more about dogs than most of us, and Ren knows more about living in
>snow---and though I could probably give Pam's daughter a pointer or two on
>dogs (bad pun), I would have to defer to Ren on all snow subjects. I could
>certainly have questions for both, but I might have to object with Pam's
>daughter based on more experience. Many here would be put to shame by Pam's
>daughter with reference to dogs, but would challenge things Ren has to say
>about driving in snow (because they live in St Paul or Toronto or

whereever).

>
>The really cool thing about the younger posters and lurkers is that they've
>already got a clue! And not just a clue---they have a handle on it. And

they

>certainly have it over 98% of the country. Some of us would give our right
>hands to have known this stuff earlier before we exposed our children to
>school!
>
>What older posters are questioning is why a newbie---no matter how
>"unschooling-aware" she is---would be posting that tv is
>"bad/wrong/ugly/inappropriate" for a 3 yr old. Making "judgements" based on
>years of watching our kids view and not view tv is using facts and hands-on
>experience. Yes, the experts have watched children and tv too---school
>children who must also do homework and get to bed early and read 100 pages

>night. School children who are also taught to do what any authority figure
>says (this could make them pretty good targets for commercials, too).
>
>Children whose tv isn't regulated (or denied) won't watch EVERYTHING---they
>become more discriminating-------------judges! Experience has shown us

that.

>
>Kelly
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>[email protected]
>
>
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

[email protected]

1 Feb 2002, at 9:57am

In a message dated 2/1/02 6:57:15 AM, ElissaJC@... writes:

<< Is there another way to create links in an email coming from aol? maybe by
copying and pasting? I would love to follow the links but they arent
clickable and many times >>

I only use the AOL links to other AOL users (unless I forget, but I'm aware
of the problem). On instant messenger they work (I think even to people
outside the system) and in internal AOL e-mail, but when I sent to mixed
groups I often send it both ways--use the heart and cut'n'paste the link.

But to any yahoo-group address, AOLers need to cut'n'paste directly, because
even other AOL addresses are getting mail then from yahoo, not AOL.

(Sorry to explain out what many of you know and most don't care about.)

Sandra