Re: [AlwaysLearning] birth order
[email protected]
In a message dated 9/22/2003 3:53:16 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[email protected] writes:
I'm a first-born and a Leo.
Nobody has ever assumed otherwise. <g>
Sandra<<<<
Me too---except that I have been mistaken for an "only" occasionally. The way
it *should* have been! <G>
~Kelly
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[email protected] writes:
I'm a first-born and a Leo.
Nobody has ever assumed otherwise. <g>
Sandra<<<<
Me too---except that I have been mistaken for an "only" occasionally. The way
it *should* have been! <G>
~Kelly
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[email protected]
In a message dated 9/22/2003 7:13:09 AM Central Daylight Time,
kbcdlovejo@... writes:
Not sure if I actually believe in astrology but I can usually identify a
fellow Cancer within a few minutes of talking with one.
Amy Kagey
<A HREF="http://www.ubah.com/ecommerce/default.asp?sid=Z0939&gid=1684902">Free shipping on </A><A HREF="http://www.ubah.com/ecommerce/default.asp?sid=Z0939&gid=1684902">Usborne Books</A> !
Join Usborne for only $29.95 in Sept!
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
kbcdlovejo@... writes:
> I'm a first-born and a Leo.I'm a Cancer and first-born, married a Cancer who is youngest of 6 siblings.
> Nobody has ever assumed otherwise. <g>
>
Not sure if I actually believe in astrology but I can usually identify a
fellow Cancer within a few minutes of talking with one.
Amy Kagey
<A HREF="http://www.ubah.com/ecommerce/default.asp?sid=Z0939&gid=1684902">Free shipping on </A><A HREF="http://www.ubah.com/ecommerce/default.asp?sid=Z0939&gid=1684902">Usborne Books</A> !
Join Usborne for only $29.95 in Sept!
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
nellebelle
My older dd fantasizes about being an only.
Mary Ellen
<<<<<<<<<<Me too---except that I have been mistaken for an "only" occasionally. The way it *should* have been!>>>>>>>>>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Mary Ellen
<<<<<<<<<<Me too---except that I have been mistaken for an "only" occasionally. The way it *should* have been!>>>>>>>>>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]