Re: Bryant case
[email protected]
In a message dated 12/19/2001 12:31:45 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[email protected] writes:
outrage about having to do the yearly proposal. I don't want Salem to start
worrying they should require MORE, since they've actually always been
supportive and positive.
And my OTHER truth: I don't think I could ever risk my son's well-being on
those grounds.
Kathryn
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[email protected] writes:
> And - just asking - isn't it an irritation to many because mostYes, yes, yes....and the truth is, some of us (like me) don't have any moral
> homeschoolers
> in MA are perfectly happy with existing law/case law since they are able to
> do any kind of homeschooling and they consider the requirements to be
> perfunctory? Aren't many MA homeschoolers concerned about increased
> publicity
> as the Bryant case spreads across the country and people get involved who
> don't live in MA and don't necessarily fully understand the subtleties and
> don't have to live, themselves, with the repercussions of any changes in
> homeschooling legalities that they might bring about there?
>
>
outrage about having to do the yearly proposal. I don't want Salem to start
worrying they should require MORE, since they've actually always been
supportive and positive.
And my OTHER truth: I don't think I could ever risk my son's well-being on
those grounds.
Kathryn
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]