Re: [AlwaysLearning] age?
[email protected]
In a message dated 11/1/2002 1:06:05 PM Eastern Standard Time,
Tuck@[email protected] writes:
birth the first time? You look SOOOO young to have two this old!
~Kelly
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Tuck@[email protected] writes:
> For my adult kids who still live here (JonTuck, Are these your biological kids? If so, were you NINE when you gave
> will be 18 in 5 days; Jake, 20, is off at boot camp),
birth the first time? You look SOOOO young to have two this old!
~Kelly
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[email protected]
In a message dated 11/1/2002 12:32:48 PM Central Standard Time,
kbcdlovejo@... writes:
Honestly, I wasn't trying to hide my gray streaks from you. At 40-3/4, I'm
only slightly younger than yourself.
Tuck
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
kbcdlovejo@... writes:
> Tuck, Are these your biological kids? If so, were you NINE when you gaveYes, dearie. I was 9. I was going for that world record. :::blushing:::
> birth the first time? You look SOOOO young to have two this old!
>
>
Honestly, I wasn't trying to hide my gray streaks from you. At 40-3/4, I'm
only slightly younger than yourself.
Tuck
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]