[email protected]

In a message dated 6/16/03 4:07:43 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
SandraDodd@... writes:

> <<Because I think that all philosophies are
> based on perspective and not being able to see another persons perspective
> does
> not mean that either party lacks sight, but rather they do not share the
> same
> view. >>
>
> I don't even begin to think that all points of view are equally valid.


Why?

>
> Sandra
>

Perhaps my brain is truly fried, but who mentioned equality and validity
regarding philosophy? Did I miss it somewhere or was this the first time it was
stated? I know I never brought up either equality or validity in philosophy,
because that is subjective and again goes back to perspective. So I guess I'm
wondering how you discern whether anyone's personal philosophies are valid and
why? I mean, is it a necessity to validate the person, or their worthiness? What
makes one philosophy more valid than anothers?

A difference in view by no means makes one philosophy dust and another rock
solid.

Rhonda - Just my humble philosophy


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]