Re: [Unschooling-dotcom] Censorship and unschooling cannot existtogether!
[email protected]
In a message dated 1/6/03 3:39:56 PM Eastern Standard Time,
ecsamhill@... writes:
what someone is saying. Everyone's email has some sort of block or ignore
function. Too much gobbledygook mail that is annoying, just block the
sender. That leaves the decision up to each member as to how they want to
deal with others posts. Again, I dont know exactly what went on, but it
seems to me, that if one has nobody to argue with, they would eventually stop
posting. I would assume there had to be some fuel to the fire for Ned to
continue posting. Would he just keep posting to "deaf ears"? Hmmm, well,
he might.. lol.. but if he was blocked, how would you know?
Teresa
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
ecsamhill@... writes:
> If Ned came back to this list, I would just auto-delete him. Which I'mEXCELLENT idea. And I feel that is what folks should do if they dont like
> sure is preferable to me getting really pissed and screaming at him.
>
what someone is saying. Everyone's email has some sort of block or ignore
function. Too much gobbledygook mail that is annoying, just block the
sender. That leaves the decision up to each member as to how they want to
deal with others posts. Again, I dont know exactly what went on, but it
seems to me, that if one has nobody to argue with, they would eventually stop
posting. I would assume there had to be some fuel to the fire for Ned to
continue posting. Would he just keep posting to "deaf ears"? Hmmm, well,
he might.. lol.. but if he was blocked, how would you know?
Teresa
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[email protected]
In a message dated 1/6/03 2:46:10 PM, grlynbl@... writes:
<< EXCELLENT idea. And I feel that is what folks should do if they dont
like
what someone is saying. Everyone's email has some sort of block or ignore
function. Too much gobbledygook mail that is annoying, just block the
sender. That leaves the decision up to each member as to how they want to
deal with others posts. Again, I dont know exactly what went on, but it
seems to me, that if one has nobody to argue with, they would eventually stop
posting. I would assume there had to be some fuel to the fire for Ned to
continue posting. Would he just keep posting to "deaf ears"? Hmmm, well,
he might.. lol.. but if he was blocked, how would you know? >>
This isn't about unschooling.
There are places to go to read Ned's views if you're interested.
Not everyone's e-mail programs can block.
<<Too much gobbledygook mail that is annoying, just block the
sender. >>
It's easier for me to ask you to save your opinions for things you really
know about than for some part of 1000 people to try to figure out how to
block.
Sandra
<< EXCELLENT idea. And I feel that is what folks should do if they dont
like
what someone is saying. Everyone's email has some sort of block or ignore
function. Too much gobbledygook mail that is annoying, just block the
sender. That leaves the decision up to each member as to how they want to
deal with others posts. Again, I dont know exactly what went on, but it
seems to me, that if one has nobody to argue with, they would eventually stop
posting. I would assume there had to be some fuel to the fire for Ned to
continue posting. Would he just keep posting to "deaf ears"? Hmmm, well,
he might.. lol.. but if he was blocked, how would you know? >>
This isn't about unschooling.
There are places to go to read Ned's views if you're interested.
Not everyone's e-mail programs can block.
<<Too much gobbledygook mail that is annoying, just block the
sender. >>
It's easier for me to ask you to save your opinions for things you really
know about than for some part of 1000 people to try to figure out how to
block.
Sandra
[email protected]
In a message dated 1/6/2003 2:40:14 PM Central Standard Time,
ecsamhill@... writes:
and I don't think he could keep being a pain towards people he actually
*knew*.
But maybe I underestimate him. ;)
Tuck
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
ecsamhill@... writes:
> If Ned came back to this list, I would just auto-delete him. Which I'mI think if he came back he'd be different, because a lot of us met him in SC
> sure is preferable to me getting really pissed and screaming at him.
>
and I don't think he could keep being a pain towards people he actually
*knew*.
But maybe I underestimate him. ;)
Tuck
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[email protected]
In a message dated 1/6/03 4:46:24 PM Eastern Standard Time, grlynbl@...
writes:
Why don't you go read the archives so that you will better understand what
many here are referring to when talking about Ned?
Since you weren't here and all.
*~*Elissa Jill*~*
unschooling Momma to 3 beautiful brilliant people
Loving partner for life to Joey
terrible guitarist, fair singer and happy woman.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
writes:
> . I would assume there had to be some fuel to the fire for Ned toHe was. Over and over again
> continue posting. Would he just keep posting to "deaf ears"?
Why don't you go read the archives so that you will better understand what
many here are referring to when talking about Ned?
Since you weren't here and all.
*~*Elissa Jill*~*
unschooling Momma to 3 beautiful brilliant people
Loving partner for life to Joey
terrible guitarist, fair singer and happy woman.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[email protected]
In a message dated 1/7/03 9:29:21 AM Eastern Standard Time,
Earthmomma67@... writes:
Teresa
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Earthmomma67@... writes:
> He was. Over and over againNah, I'll take your word for it.
> Why don't you go read the archives so that you will better understand what
> many here are referring to when talking about Ned?
> Since you weren't here and all.
>
>
Teresa
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]