Re: 2282 - truancy
Luz Shosie and Ned Vare
on 8/24/02 2:57 PM, [email protected] at
[email protected] wrote:
I didn't say this was a support group. I presume, however, that most of the
listers are members of them, some in the state that levies fines for
non-attendance of school.
I also did not suggest that anyone on this list should do the challenging.
I also did not bring up the subject of the fines for truancy or the new
threat in CA. I am participating in the existing discussions. NV
[email protected] wrote:
> Subject: Re:Fines for Truancy ?I am aware that this is not a support group.
>
> At 1:55 PM -0400 8/24/02, Luz Shosie and Ned Vare wrote:
>> PS Such an outrageous situation as this needs to be challenged. What are
>> support groups for, if not this?
>
> So isn't there a local support group challenging this outrageous
> situtation? If not, why not start one?
>
> This isn't a support group, it's a discussion list. Pretty big difference.
>
> Helen
I didn't say this was a support group. I presume, however, that most of the
listers are members of them, some in the state that levies fines for
non-attendance of school.
I also did not suggest that anyone on this list should do the challenging.
I also did not bring up the subject of the fines for truancy or the new
threat in CA. I am participating in the existing discussions. NV
Helen Hegener
At 11:31 PM -0400 8/24/02, Luz Shosie and Ned Vare wrote:
Helen
> > This isn't a support group, it's a discussion list. Pretty big difference.Aw, Ned... are we going to get into nit-picking now?
>>
>> Helen
>
>I am aware that this is not a support group.
>
>I didn't say this was a support group. I presume, however, that most of the
>listers are members of them, some in the state that levies fines for
>non-attendance of school.
Helen