Re: 2243 - "private email "
Luz Shosie and Ned Vare
on 8/14/02 11:57 AM, [email protected] at
[email protected] wrote:
to understand this, just explain the sequence for me.
It's been a wild two weeks.
Best wishes,
Ned
[email protected] wrote:
> Message: 1Thanks, I guess, for trying to inform me, but I don't get it. If you want me
> Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 08:47:12 -0400
> From: Bill and Diane <cen46624@...>
> Subject: Re: Between you and I (private) Very much agree with you.
>
> ElissaJC@... wrote:
>
>> THIs was private email?
>> Bullsh*t.
>>
>> ~Elissa Cleaveland
>> "It is nothing short of a miracle that the modern methods of instruction
>> have
>> not yet entirely strangled the holy curiosity of inquiry." A. Einstein
>>
>
> Actually it was ment to be private otherwise I would not have stuck in
> Richard Bandlers' comments, nor put the phrase that you enjoined within.
> Push the wrong button and the wrong person or entity gets the email.
>
> I appologise to the list for using language proper to email. And to Ned
> for Overherd advice.
>
> Bill
>
to understand this, just explain the sequence for me.
It's been a wild two weeks.
Best wishes,
Ned