time limits
[email protected]
In a message dated 5/29/2002 10:43:03 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
[email protected] writes:
Carol wrote:
back to us! <g>
Kelly
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[email protected] writes:
Carol wrote:
> I will take your advise and giveBad attitude. Lose the time limit. Or maybe give it six YEARS and then get
> it 6 months.
>
back to us! <g>
Kelly
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[email protected]
In a message dated 5/29/02 9:02:41 PM, kbcdlovejo@... writes:
<< Carol wrote:
back to us! <g> >>
Hey, that was MY advice! GOOD attitude! <bwg>
(I assume before six months are up nobody's counting anymore.)
(And I'm guessing, Kelly, you missed some of the thread.)
Sandra
<< Carol wrote:
> I will take your advise and giveBad attitude. Lose the time limit. Or maybe give it six YEARS and then get
> it 6 months.
>
back to us! <g> >>
Hey, that was MY advice! GOOD attitude! <bwg>
(I assume before six months are up nobody's counting anymore.)
(And I'm guessing, Kelly, you missed some of the thread.)
Sandra