Subject: Re: re:.......more of an unschooling approach
[email protected]
________________________________________________________________________
Message: 21
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 14:32:29 -0600
From: Mimi Moorehead <groundhoggirl@...>
Subject: Re: re:.......more of an unschooling approach
Message: 21
Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2001 14:32:29 -0600
From: Mimi Moorehead <groundhoggirl@...>
Subject: Re: re:.......more of an unschooling approach
On Thursday, December 27, 2001, at 12:38 PM, nanandter@... wrote:
>
>
>> Public schools "say" they accommodate ADD children, but let me tell you
> it is impossible for them to do so.
>
> The last year that my son was in public school they put off his 504
> Accomodation Plan meeting until January. (it should have taken place no
> later
> than October). At the meeting I asked the teacher why she had not made
> the
> accomodations that were outlined in the plan ( I had asked her on an
> almost
> daily basis up to this point), she replied that she didn't have a copy
> of the
> plan. That's when the special ed director realized that this teacher
> was a
> complete idiot, as I had been telling her. (she could've gotten a copy
> from
> me or the special ed director, but never asked) Anything the teacher
> said
> after that point in the meeting was looked upon with suspision and I
> caught
> her in an out-and-out lie and called her on it. (she responded by
> stating
> that she "didn't remember saying that").
>I don't want to sound like I'm defending the teacher here, I'm sure if
>you felt she lied, then she probably did. But, my question is, HOW COME
>THE SPECIAL ED ADMINISTRATORS DIDN'T MAKE SURE SHE WAS GIVEN A >COPY OF
>THE MODIFICATIONS TO KEEP IN HER FILES IN HER CLASSROOM? I feel that
>should be part of that administrators job - to make sure all the
>teachers have their mods in their classrooms.
The first day of school I informed the teacher that Andrew has Asperger
Syndrome and he had a 504 Accomodation plan-she said that she saw that in his
file, and she never asked for a copy so I assumed that she had one.
> I didn't feel it was right that it be eaten up by continuous
>trips to the Special Ed office, ESPECIALLY WHEN THE ADMINISTRATORS >THERE
>HAVE SEVERAL SECRETARIES AND STUDENT HELPERS WHO COULD >EASILY
>HAND-DELIVER THESE VERY IMPORTANT MODIFICATIONS TO THE VERY >BUSY
>TEACHERS.
I can understand the frustration,but in our case, the teacher never even made
any attempt to get his file, and you are right about the admin staff--the
principal didn't give a rat's butt about my son's situation.
>The administrators should remember that the teachers are very busy
>serving their many students. They should be the ones who put those mods
>in the teacher's box or deliver them to the classroom. The teachers are
>under much more stress and are much busier than those administrators.
In this case the principal wouldn't give me the time of day. After many (15+)
attempts to get a new 504 meeting, and no one returning my calls, I finally
left a note for the principal saying that Andrew wasn't going to school until
she saw me. It took her 9 school days to call me- then they marked him as
truant for those days because I failed to date the note and had no proof of
when I left it.
>Also, was this a new teacher? Was she new to the school? Did she know
>how the system worked? I remember my first year at my last high
>school. I was totally on my own. I didn't know who anyone was, where
>anything was, or what the policies and systems were. All the other
>teachers are so incredibly busy, they don't have time to teach and/or
>direct you. I didn't have a mentor teacher to help me because I was not
>a first-year teacher. It took me almost an entire school-year before I
>felt comfortable with how things worked there.
Yes, she was a new teacher but I was there every day, trying to talk to her
and get help for whatever she needed. She resisted all my efforts and also I
stopped volunteering because she complained evey time I was there about what
I was doing and how much time I spent with my son. She made excuses for not
communicating with me and not meeting the accomodations that I asked for.
>IMO, in your son's case, the administrators should have taken some of
>the blame for not having the accommodations or modifications put into
>the hands of the teacher. There is the possibility the teacher was
>totally overwhelmed and the administrators should have realized that.
I agree--everyone dropped the ball--but there's more to this story...
I work in a major grocery chain in our community and on 3 different occasions
I had kids from his classrom some in the store and tell me that "Mrs. Brennan
was being mean to Andrew"--lots of verbal abuse--screaming at him and
slamming her hand down on his desk. Of course when I questiond her she always
denied it, and Andrew never told me because he was too afraid. I know that he
was not a behavior problem--he just required too much of her time ......
Nancy S
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Mimi Moorehead
On Friday, December 28, 2001, at 12:36 PM, nanandter@... wrote:
majority of the administrators and teachers cared more about the
security of their jobs and their own comfort levels than they did the
kids.
students. I hope you complained to the principal about her. It's
unfortunate that so many (most) teachers don't want anyone around in
their classroom - not even other teachers. It's like they're trying to
hide something.
I always welcomed and encouraged parents to visit the classroom. I
found it helped with classroom management. The kids always seemed to
behave a little better and were more respectful toward me and each other
when there was someone else in the classroom. I always wanted to share
with them what was going on in my classroom.
Mama of Leroy & Paul, born 01/10/94
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> ________________________________________________________________________While I was working at the schools, it was always my impression that the
>
> I can understand the frustration,but in our case, the teacher never
> even made
> any attempt to get his file, and you are right about the admin
> staff--the
> principal didn't give a rat's butt about my son's situation.
> ==================
majority of the administrators and teachers cared more about the
security of their jobs and their own comfort levels than they did the
kids.
> =======================Yep. That sounds pretty typical.
>
> In this case the principal wouldn't give me the time of day. After many
> (15+)
> attempts to get a new 504 meeting, and no one returning my calls, I
> finally
> left a note for the principal saying that Andrew wasn't going to school
> until
> she saw me. It took her 9 school days to call me- then they marked him
> as
> truant for those days because I failed to date the note and had no
> proof of
> when I left it.
> ====================
>> =======================That would make me really angry. She obviously didn't care for her
>
> Yes, she was a new teacher but I was there every day, trying to talk to
> her
> and get help for whatever she needed. She resisted all my efforts and
> also I
> stopped volunteering because she complained evey time I was there about
> what
> I was doing and how much time I spent with my son. She made excuses for
> not
> communicating with me and not meeting the accomodations that I asked
> for.
> ====================
students. I hope you complained to the principal about her. It's
unfortunate that so many (most) teachers don't want anyone around in
their classroom - not even other teachers. It's like they're trying to
hide something.
I always welcomed and encouraged parents to visit the classroom. I
found it helped with classroom management. The kids always seemed to
behave a little better and were more respectful toward me and each other
when there was someone else in the classroom. I always wanted to share
with them what was going on in my classroom.
> ===================================================
> I agree--everyone dropped the ball--but there's more to this story...
> I work in a major grocery chain in our community and on 3 different
> occasions
> I had kids from his classrom some in the store and tell me that "Mrs.
> Brennan
> was being mean to Andrew"--lots of verbal abuse--screaming at him and
> slamming her hand down on his desk. Of course when I questiond her she
> always
> denied it, and Andrew never told me because he was too afraid. I know
> that he
> was not a behavior problem--he just required too much of her time ......
>
> Nancy S
> You did the right thing to pull him out. She sounds like a b_____ andMimi
> was responsible for a very unhealthy classroom environment. Actually,
> I think schools, as a whole, are very unhealthy. They have a culture
> all their own that does not resemble real life. Schools are not good
> places for children to be. Everyone is under such tremendous stress
> that too many times they behave in ways that they would never exhibit
> in the real world. I hate to admit it, but I am guilty of it myself.
> But, it didn't happen too often, and I was aware that the stress and
> nature of the environment in the school affected my behavior in a
> negative way. I think perhaps too many teachers don't realize this and
> don't check themselves. I have a hard time believing that some of the
> behaviors I have seen out of teachers in the schools is the same
> behavior they exhibit elsewhere. I believe the same is true for many
> children. It has a lot to do with all the stress present in that
> environment. A school is the last place I would ever want my children
> to be in. These are just my opinions.
>Mimi
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> Message boards, timely articles, a free newsletter and more!
> Check it all out at: http://www.unschooling.com
>
> To unsubscribe, set preferences, or read archives:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Unschooling-dotcom
>
> Another great list sponsored by Home Education Magazine!
> http://www.home-ed-magazine.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
Mama of Leroy & Paul, born 01/10/94
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]