Bridget E Coffman

No, this discussion started with a whole different person. I have not
brought up the weeks in early September (with one exception) and as far
as know no one else has either. My one exception was that when someone
said, - I never say something like that. - I asked her to go look at a
specific message where she did say something just like that.

You know, the funny thing is, I wondered when I got involved in this
conversation, how long it would be before someone tried to pin it all on
the earlier conversation. It is after all very similar to that one even
if it was started by others who felt attacked.

Bridget


> Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2001 21:45:34 -0600
> From: "Julie Stauffer" <jnjstau@...>
> Subject: Re: Digest Number 1595
> However, I do notice that once
> again, (as we do on a very regular basis) we have returned to the
> discussion of Bridgets's perceived bashing.
>
> Julie

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
In three words I can sum up everything I've learned about life: it
goes on.
- Robert Frost

[email protected]

In a message dated 11/19/2001 1:17:57 PM !!!First Boot!!!,
rumpleteasermom@... writes:


> It is after all very similar to that one even
> if it was started by others who felt attacked.
>
> Bridget
>
>


Yep -- all of this dreck is very similar to several threads on this list --
pre- and post- Bridget. Going back to lurking (for, I think, the 3rd time)
-- someone put up a subject line when the subject changes to something
worthwhile.

Nance



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]